Kinematic Behavior of Geogrid Reinforcements during Earthquakes

Re clic loading ge mmary of the r a large-scale commodates so ferent shear an e testing prog tors affecting tensibility of aracteristics of tial static load ting program. ect of these pa ll as the dis aluated. Concl nforced earth w Keywords—G d Large scale T EOTECHN interaction en well inves e same interac ll need to be cognized that fine the effec d incorporate rth structures Within the la uctures were ilure during e inforced earth )) and Taiwa taining struct en the rest of ], [10], [8], an insufficient splacement o nnection failu inadequacy o e different m der static and Ahmed Hosny A nter, Cairo, Egyp osny66@hotmail Mohamed Abde search Center, Ca Kin inforced earth nerated from esults and anal multi-function il samples up d pullout tests ram was carrie soil/geogrid in the geogrids, the cyclic load within the ge Based on the rameters on th placement mo usions and re alls under cycl eogrid, Soil, esting. I. INTR ICAL perfo subjected to tigated in the tion under th further investi further in-dep t of the contr them within [6]. st two decad reported in th arthquakes. F walls during n (Fig. 1 ( ures showed the surround d [11]. Resea pullout resis f the geogri re between th f the safety odes of failu /or cyclic load bdel-Rahman, P t (phone: +2010 .com). l-Moneim, Ass iro (e-mail: abdm emati structures are g earthquakes. T yses of a testin geosynthetic t to 1.0 m3. Th under both stat d out to inves teraction unde the applied ing (frequency ogrid sheet w findings of the e pullout resis bility under commendation ic loading are p